<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 665 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186215</link>
    <description>The Member found that the Custom House Agent&#039;s activities did not align with the &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; category but were more suited to &#039;Steamer Agent&#039; activities. The order imposing Service tax was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 665 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186215</link>
      <description>The Member found that the Custom House Agent&#039;s activities did not align with the &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; category but were more suited to &#039;Steamer Agent&#039; activities. The order imposing Service tax was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>