<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1137 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals for A.Y 2004-05 and 2005-06 while allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y 2006-07. The additions on account of scrap, disallowance of foreign traveling expenses, disallowance of telephone expenses, and addition out of job work income were all deleted by the Tribunal due to lack of justification or evidence provided by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:44:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1137 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals for A.Y 2004-05 and 2005-06 while allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y 2006-07. The additions on account of scrap, disallowance of foreign traveling expenses, disallowance of telephone expenses, and addition out of job work income were all deleted by the Tribunal due to lack of justification or evidence provided by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>