<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1052 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186209</link>
    <description>The ITAT Agra upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a case involving additions under section 2(22)(e) of the IT Act. The CIT(A) deleted the additions of Rs. 3,85,39,213 and Rs. 2,00,000, ruling that deemed dividends should be taxed in the hands of the shareholder, not the concern. The CIT(A) relied on judicial decisions supporting this interpretation. Despite the Revenue&#039;s appeal, the ITAT Agra dismissed it, affirming that the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1052 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186209</link>
      <description>The ITAT Agra upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a case involving additions under section 2(22)(e) of the IT Act. The CIT(A) deleted the additions of Rs. 3,85,39,213 and Rs. 2,00,000, ruling that deemed dividends should be taxed in the hands of the shareholder, not the concern. The CIT(A) relied on judicial decisions supporting this interpretation. Despite the Revenue&#039;s appeal, the ITAT Agra dismissed it, affirming that the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>