<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (4) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186201</link>
    <description>Rent from buildings erected by a lessee on leased land was assessable as income from property where the lease showed the lessee bore construction costs, paid municipal tax, and retained ownership of the structures during the lease term, with the lessor&#039;s entitlement arising only on expiry or a contractual contingency. On that footing, the annual value of the let buildings fell within the house-property charging provision, and the assessee&#039;s business objects of acquiring and letting houses did not convert such receipts into business profits. The rent was therefore taxable under Section 9, not as business income under Section 10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (4) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186201</link>
      <description>Rent from buildings erected by a lessee on leased land was assessable as income from property where the lease showed the lessee bore construction costs, paid municipal tax, and retained ownership of the structures during the lease term, with the lessor&#039;s entitlement arising only on expiry or a contractual contingency. On that footing, the annual value of the let buildings fell within the house-property charging provision, and the assessee&#039;s business objects of acquiring and letting houses did not convert such receipts into business profits. The rent was therefore taxable under Section 9, not as business income under Section 10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>