<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4720</link>
    <description>Support services rendered to HPCL through a retail outlet were treated on a prima facie view as Business Auxiliary Services and therefore potentially liable to service tax for the relevant period. The Tribunal noted that HPCL marketed its products directly while the applicant provided ancillary operational support, and found those activities to fall within the apparent scope of taxable service for stay purposes. Considering the applicant&#039;s status as a small-scale operator and difficulty in arranging funds, the Tribunal granted conditional interim relief: a specified pre-deposit was ordered within the time allowed, and on compliance the balance demand and penalties were waived for recovery purposes and stay of recovery was extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4720</link>
      <description>Support services rendered to HPCL through a retail outlet were treated on a prima facie view as Business Auxiliary Services and therefore potentially liable to service tax for the relevant period. The Tribunal noted that HPCL marketed its products directly while the applicant provided ancillary operational support, and found those activities to fall within the apparent scope of taxable service for stay purposes. Considering the applicant&#039;s status as a small-scale operator and difficulty in arranging funds, the Tribunal granted conditional interim relief: a specified pre-deposit was ordered within the time allowed, and on compliance the balance demand and penalties were waived for recovery purposes and stay of recovery was extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>