<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 712 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186188</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC considered whether the ITAT could proceed with an appeal when the assessee was not served with, or could not produce, a witness for cross-examination, and whether reliance on Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act justified denial of that opportunity. The court admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law on these issues for consideration. Filing of paper books was dispensed with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 712 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186188</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC considered whether the ITAT could proceed with an appeal when the assessee was not served with, or could not produce, a witness for cross-examination, and whether reliance on Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act justified denial of that opportunity. The court admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law on these issues for consideration. Filing of paper books was dispensed with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>