https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4719 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order demanding over Rs. 1.38 crores in service tax and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, for "Consulting Engineer's Service." The party was not given a fair opportunity to reply to the show-cause notice, leading to a denial of natural justice. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard. The party was directed to promptly file their reply and participate in hearings without unnecessary delays, highlighting the significance of transparency in legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4719 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order demanding over Rs. 1.38 crores in service tax and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, for "Consulting Engineer's Service." The party was not given a fair opportunity to reply to the show-cause notice, leading to a denial of natural justice. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard. The party was directed to promptly file their reply and participate in hearings without unnecessary delays, highlighting the significance of transparency in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4719