<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 600 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186174</link>
    <description>The Apprentices Act, 1961 is a special regime governing apprenticeship training and prevails over the general definition of &quot;workman&quot; under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. A contract of apprenticeship under Section 4 is the foundation of the relationship, and after the 1973 amendment training commences on execution of the contract, with registration required thereafter; non-registration is not stated to render the contract void. Apprentices remain trainees, not workers, and the statutory enforcement scheme is penal and remedial rather than one that converts apprenticeship into employment. A genuine apprenticeship therefore does not become a workman relationship absent pleading and proof of camouflage or a ruse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 600 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186174</link>
      <description>The Apprentices Act, 1961 is a special regime governing apprenticeship training and prevails over the general definition of &quot;workman&quot; under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. A contract of apprenticeship under Section 4 is the foundation of the relationship, and after the 1973 amendment training commences on execution of the contract, with registration required thereafter; non-registration is not stated to render the contract void. Apprentices remain trainees, not workers, and the statutory enforcement scheme is penal and remedial rather than one that converts apprenticeship into employment. A genuine apprenticeship therefore does not become a workman relationship absent pleading and proof of camouflage or a ruse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>