<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332069</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on service tax paid on Goods Transport Agency services was addressed by CESTAT, Chennai. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority for further adjudication following clarification on entitlement to Cenvat credit on transportation of goods. The Court directed the adjudicating authority to decide on the availability of credit on service tax paid on transportation charges from the factory to its own factories within a specified timeframe, emphasizing a fair hearing and compliance with applicable laws. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was disposed of, stressing the importance of a thorough adjudication based on the Tribunal&#039;s order and relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2016 20:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332069</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on service tax paid on Goods Transport Agency services was addressed by CESTAT, Chennai. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority for further adjudication following clarification on entitlement to Cenvat credit on transportation of goods. The Court directed the adjudicating authority to decide on the availability of credit on service tax paid on transportation charges from the factory to its own factories within a specified timeframe, emphasizing a fair hearing and compliance with applicable laws. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was disposed of, stressing the importance of a thorough adjudication based on the Tribunal&#039;s order and relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>