https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332067 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging liability for service tax on road construction/renovation works, emphasizing the availability of the alternative remedy of appeal and rejecting claims of hardship due to mandatory pre-deposit. The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the authority passing the impugned orders and underscored the efficacy of the appellate remedy, directing the petitioners to pursue appeals within thirty days. The court did not delve into the merits of the case but instructed the appellate authority to consider the appeals on their substance, disregarding any limitation issues. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Sep 2016 23:55:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332067 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging liability for service tax on road construction/renovation works, emphasizing the availability of the alternative remedy of appeal and rejecting claims of hardship due to mandatory pre-deposit. The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the authority passing the impugned orders and underscored the efficacy of the appellate remedy, directing the petitioners to pursue appeals within thirty days. The court did not delve into the merits of the case but instructed the appellate authority to consider the appeals on their substance, disregarding any limitation issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332067