<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 310 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332049</link>
    <description>Section 8(2) of the Assam Amusement and Betting Tax Act, 1939 was construed as relieving the cinema exhibitor&#039;s liability to pay entertainment tax, rather than conferring the benefit on movie-goers. On that construction, tax amounts collected during the exempted period were not treated as illegally collected so as to require refund or deposit on an unjust enrichment theory. The Court also held that authorities could not assess entertainment tax for the exempted period merely on an allegation that tax had been collected from patrons. The assessment orders and demand notices for that period were therefore held illegal and without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 310 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332049</link>
      <description>Section 8(2) of the Assam Amusement and Betting Tax Act, 1939 was construed as relieving the cinema exhibitor&#039;s liability to pay entertainment tax, rather than conferring the benefit on movie-goers. On that construction, tax amounts collected during the exempted period were not treated as illegally collected so as to require refund or deposit on an unjust enrichment theory. The Court also held that authorities could not assess entertainment tax for the exempted period merely on an allegation that tax had been collected from patrons. The assessment orders and demand notices for that period were therefore held illegal and without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>