<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 295 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332034</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed that the real estate developments, Omaxe Grandwoods (GH-03) Noida and Omaxe Palm Greens-I, Greater Noida, qualified as separate housing projects eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that these projects were standalone housing developments with distinct plots and common facilities, meeting the Act&#039;s conditions independently. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the entire project needed to comply with Section 80IB(10) criteria, emphasizing the self-sufficiency of the projects. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial legal issues were identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 19:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 295 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332034</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed that the real estate developments, Omaxe Grandwoods (GH-03) Noida and Omaxe Palm Greens-I, Greater Noida, qualified as separate housing projects eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that these projects were standalone housing developments with distinct plots and common facilities, meeting the Act&#039;s conditions independently. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the entire project needed to comply with Section 80IB(10) criteria, emphasizing the self-sufficiency of the projects. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial legal issues were identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>