https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4710 Differential excise duty demand against an EOU was not treated as sustainable at the pre-deposit stage where the unit had already obtained a final exit order, the de-bonding duty had been quantified and paid, and the department had not objected to the exit. In the absence of any review of the Range Superintendent's proceedings or any challenge to the Development Commissioner's final exit order, the fresh demand lacked substance for interim relief purposes. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of duty and penalty was stayed. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4710 Differential excise duty demand against an EOU was not treated as sustainable at the pre-deposit stage where the unit had already obtained a final exit order, the de-bonding duty had been quantified and paid, and the department had not objected to the exit. In the absence of any review of the Range Superintendent's proceedings or any challenge to the Development Commissioner's final exit order, the fresh demand lacked substance for interim relief purposes. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of duty and penalty was stayed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4710