<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186162</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the loans received should not be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) as the transaction fell under the money-lending business exemption. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the charging of interest under sections 234B and 234D, noting that the assessment order had only directed interest under sections 234B and 234C, leading to relief being granted on this ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186162</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the loans received should not be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) as the transaction fell under the money-lending business exemption. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the charging of interest under sections 234B and 234D, noting that the assessment order had only directed interest under sections 234B and 234C, leading to relief being granted on this ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>