<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 888 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of outstanding labour charges as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Act. The Tribunal found no evidence of unaccounted money use, accepted subsequent payment, and noted the lack of bogus expenditure or worker examination. The remaining grounds not pressed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 888 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of outstanding labour charges as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Act. The Tribunal found no evidence of unaccounted money use, accepted subsequent payment, and noted the lack of bogus expenditure or worker examination. The remaining grounds not pressed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>