<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186150</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing deductions for municipal taxes paid to a local authority in Burma when computing income from house properties in Burma under section 9 of the Income-tax Act. The judgment emphasized that taxes levied by any local authority, including those outside the Indian Union, should be considered for computing income derived from property. The court interpreted the term &quot;local authority&quot; broadly, rejecting the argument that it should be limited to authorities within the taxable territories. The decision provided a comprehensive analysis of legislative provisions and judicial precedents relevant to property taxation in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 16:42:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186150</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing deductions for municipal taxes paid to a local authority in Burma when computing income from house properties in Burma under section 9 of the Income-tax Act. The judgment emphasized that taxes levied by any local authority, including those outside the Indian Union, should be considered for computing income derived from property. The court interpreted the term &quot;local authority&quot; broadly, rejecting the argument that it should be limited to authorities within the taxable territories. The decision provided a comprehensive analysis of legislative provisions and judicial precedents relevant to property taxation in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>