<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1104 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT&#039;s invocation of provisions under section 263, directions on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) computation and set off of losses. The issue of provisions for warranty and discount was remitted back to the AO for re-examination. The order was pronounced on 26th September 2011 at Bangalore.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:02:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1104 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT&#039;s invocation of provisions under section 263, directions on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) computation and set off of losses. The issue of provisions for warranty and discount was remitted back to the AO for re-examination. The order was pronounced on 26th September 2011 at Bangalore.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>