<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1188 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186129</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed in a case involving unrecorded sales and disallowed telephone/car expenses for personal use. The issue of unrecorded sales was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication, while the disallowance of Rs. 78,024/- for personal use expenses was deleted. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the claim of the assessee in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 18:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1188 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186129</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed in a case involving unrecorded sales and disallowed telephone/car expenses for personal use. The issue of unrecorded sales was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication, while the disallowance of Rs. 78,024/- for personal use expenses was deleted. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the claim of the assessee in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>