<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 63 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision that service tax should not be imposed on reimbursable expenses received from principals, emphasizing that tax is applicable only on commission for agency services. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority for further examination. It agreed that the longer period for tax assessment cannot be invoked. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 63 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision that service tax should not be imposed on reimbursable expenses received from principals, emphasizing that tax is applicable only on commission for agency services. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority for further examination. It agreed that the longer period for tax assessment cannot be invoked. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>