<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 854 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186096</link>
    <description>The Tax Appeal was dismissed as the High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the Assessee&#039;s claim of 25% of the expenditure on maintaining the Guest House for business purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was deemed justified as the property was utilized in support of commercial activities. The court found that the Assessing Officer and the Appellate Authority failed to provide adequate reasons for denying the Assessee&#039;s claim, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 13:10:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 854 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186096</link>
      <description>The Tax Appeal was dismissed as the High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the Assessee&#039;s claim of 25% of the expenditure on maintaining the Guest House for business purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was deemed justified as the property was utilized in support of commercial activities. The court found that the Assessing Officer and the Appellate Authority failed to provide adequate reasons for denying the Assessee&#039;s claim, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>