https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332028 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal on disputed services related to outdoor catering, car hire service, and electricity charges. The decision emphasized the applicability of Rule 2(l) of CCR 2004 and cited legal precedents to support the appellant's entitlement to input service credit for the contested services. The judgment, delivered on June 24, 2016, modified the previous order, granting the appellant relief on the specified input services. en-us Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:39:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332028 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal on disputed services related to outdoor catering, car hire service, and electricity charges. The decision emphasized the applicability of Rule 2(l) of CCR 2004 and cited legal precedents to support the appellant's entitlement to input service credit for the contested services. The judgment, delivered on June 24, 2016, modified the previous order, granting the appellant relief on the specified input services. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332028