<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 288 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for further verification of the date of receipt of foreign exchange to determine the relevant date of export for deciding the limitation aspect. The cross-objection filed by the respondent was disposed of in the same terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 288 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for further verification of the date of receipt of foreign exchange to determine the relevant date of export for deciding the limitation aspect. The cross-objection filed by the respondent was disposed of in the same terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>