<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 287 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant for charges related to THC, bills of lading, and origin haulage, citing relevant precedents. The matter concerning cleaning activity was remanded for verification of a certificate provided by the appellant. For CHA services, the Tribunal permitted the refund due to cross-references in the invoices. As a result, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, granting the refund based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 287 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant for charges related to THC, bills of lading, and origin haulage, citing relevant precedents. The matter concerning cleaning activity was remanded for verification of a certificate provided by the appellant. For CHA services, the Tribunal permitted the refund due to cross-references in the invoices. As a result, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, granting the refund based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>