https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332019 The Tribunal upheld that the service tax paid on the disputed service was eligible for CENVAT credit, setting aside the adjudication order on limitation grounds. However, the appeal by the respondent/assessee was dismissed as it did not comply with the Central Excise Act, 1944, since the Commissioner had already granted relief. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:33:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332019 The Tribunal upheld that the service tax paid on the disputed service was eligible for CENVAT credit, setting aside the adjudication order on limitation grounds. However, the appeal by the respondent/assessee was dismissed as it did not comply with the Central Excise Act, 1944, since the Commissioner had already granted relief. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332019