<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals to the extent that penalties exceeding 25% of the duty for two companies and the penalty for an individual were set aside. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with payment obligations under the Central Excise Act to conclude proceedings conclusively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals to the extent that penalties exceeding 25% of the duty for two companies and the penalty for an individual were set aside. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with payment obligations under the Central Excise Act to conclude proceedings conclusively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>