<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 277 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of a car imported for personal use due to non-compliance with import policy conditions specified in Notification No.4/97-2002. The appellant&#039;s argument that the conditions were not applicable to individual importers was rejected, emphasizing the need to adhere to import regulations. The Tribunal ruled that failing to meet the specified conditions constituted a violation of the policy, resulting in the confiscation of the car and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act. Compliance with import policies was underscored as crucial, with penalties enforced for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 277 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of a car imported for personal use due to non-compliance with import policy conditions specified in Notification No.4/97-2002. The appellant&#039;s argument that the conditions were not applicable to individual importers was rejected, emphasizing the need to adhere to import regulations. The Tribunal ruled that failing to meet the specified conditions constituted a violation of the policy, resulting in the confiscation of the car and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act. Compliance with import policies was underscored as crucial, with penalties enforced for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>