https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332012 Unloading of restricted imported goods at Dighi Port after Customs permission did not make the appellant solely liable for the contravention, because the shipping line filed the IGM and the authorities had already allowed unloading under the Customs framework governing entry, unloading and port restrictions. The note records that the Department could have objected before permission was granted, while the appellant still remained bound to comply with the prevailing law. On those facts, the contravention was left undisturbed but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced on grounds of shared responsibility and leniency. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332012 Unloading of restricted imported goods at Dighi Port after Customs permission did not make the appellant solely liable for the contravention, because the shipping line filed the IGM and the authorities had already allowed unloading under the Customs framework governing entry, unloading and port restrictions. The note records that the Department could have objected before permission was granted, while the appellant still remained bound to comply with the prevailing law. On those facts, the contravention was left undisturbed but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced on grounds of shared responsibility and leniency. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332012