<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4696</link>
    <description>A liquid hair dye was held not to fall within the tariff description of &quot;hair lotion&quot; under Tariff Item 14F because its ordinary commercial meaning, actual use, and chemical character showed it to be a hair darkener rather than a lotion used for cleansing, soothing, antiseptic, medicinal, or nourishing purposes. The product could not be classified under that specific entry merely because it darkened hair or might loosely be called a lotion in a generic sense. Applying the common parlance test, the Court treated the residuary tariff item as the proper classification and found the demand based on Tariff Item 14F unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4696</link>
      <description>A liquid hair dye was held not to fall within the tariff description of &quot;hair lotion&quot; under Tariff Item 14F because its ordinary commercial meaning, actual use, and chemical character showed it to be a hair darkener rather than a lotion used for cleansing, soothing, antiseptic, medicinal, or nourishing purposes. The product could not be classified under that specific entry merely because it darkened hair or might loosely be called a lotion in a generic sense. Applying the common parlance test, the Court treated the residuary tariff item as the proper classification and found the demand based on Tariff Item 14F unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>