<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rejects Revenue&#039;s Claims on Unexplained Investment and Income Clubbing u/ss 69B, 64, 65.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31099</link>
    <description>Unexplained investment u/s 69B - Applicability of Sections 64 and 65 - clubbing of income - assessee&#039;s wife and son are the Directors of M/s. Avis Motors Pvt. Ltd. - This was not the case of the Revenue at any time right upto the Tribunal. - Contentions of the revenue rejected - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:42:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:42:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rejects Revenue&#039;s Claims on Unexplained Investment and Income Clubbing u/ss 69B, 64, 65.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31099</link>
      <description>Unexplained investment u/s 69B - Applicability of Sections 64 and 65 - clubbing of income - assessee&#039;s wife and son are the Directors of M/s. Avis Motors Pvt. Ltd. - This was not the case of the Revenue at any time right upto the Tribunal. - Contentions of the revenue rejected - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:42:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>