<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 262 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, condoning the delay in filing and setting aside the penalties levied under Sections 271D and 271E, directing the AO to cancel the penalties. The judgment emphasized that genuine transactions between family members, without intent to evade tax, constitute a reasonable cause for non-imposition of penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 262 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, condoning the delay in filing and setting aside the penalties levied under Sections 271D and 271E, directing the AO to cancel the penalties. The judgment emphasized that genuine transactions between family members, without intent to evade tax, constitute a reasonable cause for non-imposition of penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>