<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4694</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that revenue can still defend itself in cases where it did not file an appeal, if there is a just cause or public interest. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in decisions unless there are new grounds or factual changes. Divergent views among lower courts may require intervention by a higher court for a definitive ruling. The judgment directed the concerned Bench to proceed with the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4694</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that revenue can still defend itself in cases where it did not file an appeal, if there is a just cause or public interest. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in decisions unless there are new grounds or factual changes. Divergent views among lower courts may require intervention by a higher court for a definitive ruling. The judgment directed the concerned Bench to proceed with the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>