<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 248 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were unjustified in the case. Penalties related to disallowed expenses, understatement of income, short term capital gains, capital receipts claimed as gifts, differences in opinion on capital gains tax timing, and undisclosed bank balance were all contested by the assessees. The Tribunal concluded that there was no evidence of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, leading to the deletion of penalties for both parties. All four appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 248 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were unjustified in the case. Penalties related to disallowed expenses, understatement of income, short term capital gains, capital receipts claimed as gifts, differences in opinion on capital gains tax timing, and undisclosed bank balance were all contested by the assessees. The Tribunal concluded that there was no evidence of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, leading to the deletion of penalties for both parties. All four appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>