<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (5) TMI 115 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186086</link>
    <description>The court held that notices issued under section 148 of the IT Act to a deceased person were valid as they were addressed to the legal representatives. The court also found that the settlement reached by one legal representative was binding on all parties involved. Reassessment orders against the deceased were deemed valid as they were made in accordance with section 159 of the IT Act. Legal representatives were held liable for penalties imposed for inaccurate particulars furnished by the deceased. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the respondents and ordering costs against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (5) TMI 115 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186086</link>
      <description>The court held that notices issued under section 148 of the IT Act to a deceased person were valid as they were addressed to the legal representatives. The court also found that the settlement reached by one legal representative was binding on all parties involved. Reassessment orders against the deceased were deemed valid as they were made in accordance with section 159 of the IT Act. Legal representatives were held liable for penalties imposed for inaccurate particulars furnished by the deceased. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the respondents and ordering costs against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>