<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 999 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the income was estimated after rejecting the books of accounts without specific instances of inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The penalty of Rs. 1,74,594/- imposed by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 999 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the income was estimated after rejecting the books of accounts without specific instances of inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The penalty of Rs. 1,74,594/- imposed by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>