https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186070 The Tribunal allowed both appeals against the orders of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) due to lack of independent findings and the need for cogent reasons. The cases were restored to the DRP for re-adjudication with directions to provide a speaking order. The Tribunal did not express any opinion on the merits, leaving the re-adjudication to the DRP in accordance with the law. Both appeals were considered allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter to be re-adjudicated by the DRP following the Tribunal's order and legal provisions. en-us Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:28:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186070 The Tribunal allowed both appeals against the orders of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) due to lack of independent findings and the need for cogent reasons. The cases were restored to the DRP for re-adjudication with directions to provide a speaking order. The Tribunal did not express any opinion on the merits, leaving the re-adjudication to the DRP in accordance with the law. Both appeals were considered allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter to be re-adjudicated by the DRP following the Tribunal's order and legal provisions. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186070