<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1255 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186064</link>
    <description>The reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO were invalidated due to a lack of consistency in approach, as established in Radhasoami Satsang Vs. CIT. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deeming the reassessment proceedings invalid and not addressing the merits of the depreciation claim on goodwill. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 22nd July 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1255 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186064</link>
      <description>The reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO were invalidated due to a lack of consistency in approach, as established in Radhasoami Satsang Vs. CIT. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deeming the reassessment proceedings invalid and not addressing the merits of the depreciation claim on goodwill. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 22nd July 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>