https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186063 A claim arising from a railway owned by the Central Government had to be enforced against the Union of India, because the statutory concept of "railway administration" did not make the railway a separate juristic person for civil suit purposes. A suit filed only against the General Manager was therefore not maintainable, although notice in railway claims had to be served on the General Manager. The amendment to implead the Union of India was also refused on the circumstances of the case, and the defect was not treated as curable as a matter of course at that stage. en-us Mon, 30 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:49:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186063 A claim arising from a railway owned by the Central Government had to be enforced against the Union of India, because the statutory concept of "railway administration" did not make the railway a separate juristic person for civil suit purposes. A suit filed only against the General Manager was therefore not maintainable, although notice in railway claims had to be served on the General Manager. The amendment to implead the Union of India was also refused on the circumstances of the case, and the defect was not treated as curable as a matter of course at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186063