<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1166 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the service of notice under Section 158BD was invalid due to procedural non-compliance and lack of due diligence. Consequently, the assessment under Section 158BC read with Section 158BD was deemed legally flawed. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of valid notice service for jurisdiction in assessment proceedings, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1166 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the service of notice under Section 158BD was invalid due to procedural non-compliance and lack of due diligence. Consequently, the assessment under Section 158BC read with Section 158BD was deemed legally flawed. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of valid notice service for jurisdiction in assessment proceedings, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>