<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 238 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331977</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the service tax liability and interest but set aside the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The tribunal invoked the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the circumstances of the case, where the appellant promptly paid the tax liability upon notification and cited valid reasons for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 238 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331977</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the service tax liability and interest but set aside the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The tribunal invoked the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the circumstances of the case, where the appellant promptly paid the tax liability upon notification and cited valid reasons for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>