<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the order that denied CENVAT credit for various services including GTA service, auctioneer service, export survey, and setting up of a new container freight station. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, with the Tribunal finding that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit for the services utilized in connection with their business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 16:15:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the order that denied CENVAT credit for various services including GTA service, auctioneer service, export survey, and setting up of a new container freight station. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, with the Tribunal finding that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit for the services utilized in connection with their business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>