<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent in a case concerning the proper classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal determined that the products should be classified under Chapter Heading 21, as previously decided in a similar case, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate classification for determining the applicable duties under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent in a case concerning the proper classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal determined that the products should be classified under Chapter Heading 21, as previously decided in a similar case, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate classification for determining the applicable duties under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>