<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 220 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, from the date duty was expected to be paid by the appellant. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing compliance with statutory mandates regarding interest payment on delayed duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 220 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, from the date duty was expected to be paid by the appellant. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing compliance with statutory mandates regarding interest payment on delayed duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>