<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT&#039;s disagreement doesn&#039;t invalidate AO&#039;s order; ad and sales promotion expenses lack lasting benefits, not capital expenditure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31075</link>
    <description>CIT may not agree with the view taken by the ld AO. Anyway, this does not make the order passed by the ld Assessing Officer unsustainable in law as on the issue of deductibility of advertisement and sales promotion expenditure, nothing was brought on record to show that any enduring benefit has resulted in favour of the assessee which makes it capital expenditure - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT&#039;s disagreement doesn&#039;t invalidate AO&#039;s order; ad and sales promotion expenses lack lasting benefits, not capital expenditure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31075</link>
      <description>CIT may not agree with the view taken by the ld AO. Anyway, this does not make the order passed by the ld Assessing Officer unsustainable in law as on the issue of deductibility of advertisement and sales promotion expenditure, nothing was brought on record to show that any enduring benefit has resulted in favour of the assessee which makes it capital expenditure - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>