<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 215 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331954</link>
    <description>Payments for digital broadcasting of television content through a foreign satellite transponder were not royalty under Article 12(3) of the India-Thailand tax treaty because the foreign party provided broadcasting services using equipment under its control, while the assessee only supplied the programme source signal. The arrangement did not involve exploitation of copyright in a film or television broadcast, nor did it give the payer the use of, or right to use, industrial, commercial or scientific equipment. On that interpretation, the payment fell outside the treaty definition of royalty and was not taxable as such.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 215 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331954</link>
      <description>Payments for digital broadcasting of television content through a foreign satellite transponder were not royalty under Article 12(3) of the India-Thailand tax treaty because the foreign party provided broadcasting services using equipment under its control, while the assessee only supplied the programme source signal. The arrangement did not involve exploitation of copyright in a film or television broadcast, nor did it give the payer the use of, or right to use, industrial, commercial or scientific equipment. On that interpretation, the payment fell outside the treaty definition of royalty and was not taxable as such.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>