https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186038 The case involved allegations of non-existent consignee, lack of connecting link in goods receipt, hasty decision-making, and lack of evidence. The appellate order highlighted discrepancies in the receipt of goods and emphasized the necessity of establishing clear links and conducting a fair hearing with evidence testing. The appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further proceedings to ensure a comprehensive review and just consideration of all evidence for a conclusive determination. en-us Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186038 The case involved allegations of non-existent consignee, lack of connecting link in goods receipt, hasty decision-making, and lack of evidence. The appellate order highlighted discrepancies in the receipt of goods and emphasized the necessity of establishing clear links and conducting a fair hearing with evidence testing. The appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further proceedings to ensure a comprehensive review and just consideration of all evidence for a conclusive determination. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186038