<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1563 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186043</link>
    <description>The taxpayer&#039;s appeal challenging transfer pricing adjustments was allowed by the Tribunal for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of functionally dissimilar comparables, including IL &amp;amp; FS Transportation Networks Ltd. and RITES Ltd., and instructed the TPO to reconsider capital utilization and risk adjustments. The decision emphasized the significance of functional comparability and the requirement for reliable data in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1563 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186043</link>
      <description>The taxpayer&#039;s appeal challenging transfer pricing adjustments was allowed by the Tribunal for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of functionally dissimilar comparables, including IL &amp;amp; FS Transportation Networks Ltd. and RITES Ltd., and instructed the TPO to reconsider capital utilization and risk adjustments. The decision emphasized the significance of functional comparability and the requirement for reliable data in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>