<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186045</link>
    <description>Depreciation on leased vehicles was examined under section 32 on the basis that legal ownership under the lease documents and business use through leasing may satisfy the statutory test; the issue was remitted for fresh verification. Interest on sticky loans and advances was held not to accrue as taxable income for a non-banking finance company where RBI prudential norms governed income recognition and the real income principle applied. Loss on sale of repossessed assets was treated as a deductible business loss arising in the financing cycle. Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services could not be fixed at nil merely on qualitative objections; the matter was remanded for proper tested-party selection, method selection and comparability analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186045</link>
      <description>Depreciation on leased vehicles was examined under section 32 on the basis that legal ownership under the lease documents and business use through leasing may satisfy the statutory test; the issue was remitted for fresh verification. Interest on sticky loans and advances was held not to accrue as taxable income for a non-banking finance company where RBI prudential norms governed income recognition and the real income principle applied. Loss on sale of repossessed assets was treated as a deductible business loss arising in the financing cycle. Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services could not be fixed at nil merely on qualitative objections; the matter was remanded for proper tested-party selection, method selection and comparability analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>