<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1285 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186046</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed two appeals by the Revenue against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the exclusion and inclusion of companies in the final list of comparables for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price of international transactions. The Court found no substantial question of law in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1285 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186046</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed two appeals by the Revenue against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the exclusion and inclusion of companies in the final list of comparables for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price of international transactions. The Court found no substantial question of law in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>