<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 884 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186036</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the identities of the share applicants were established through supporting documents, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was upheld, with no substantial question of law identified for consideration by the court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 884 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186036</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the identities of the share applicants were established through supporting documents, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was upheld, with no substantial question of law identified for consideration by the court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>