<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1254 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that an assessment order passed in the name of a deceased person is a nullity, quashing the assessment and allowing the appeal. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of interest income on REC Bonds on a protective basis, as it was deemed consequential to the quashed assessment. Consequently, both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 11:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1254 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that an assessment order passed in the name of a deceased person is a nullity, quashing the assessment and allowing the appeal. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of interest income on REC Bonds on a protective basis, as it was deemed consequential to the quashed assessment. Consequently, both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>